Ten months into this Great Books reading program, we have completed more than 4,500 pages of reading and are still going strong. The works continue to increase in difficulty gradually, but we’re all big boys and girls and can get something out of an analytical reading of even the tough stuff.
Here are the readings for the upcoming week:
- “The Lifted Veil” by George Eliot (GGB Vol. 3, pp. 157-193)
- “Pericles” by Plutarch (GBWW Vol. 13, pp. 121-141)
- “A Letter Concerning Toleration” by John Locke (GBWW Vol. 33, pp. 1-22)
- Federalist #67-69 (GBWW Vol. 40, pp. 203-210; Antifederalist responses are here)
- An Anatomical Disquisition on the Motion of the Heart and Blood in Animals by William Harvey, Chapters VI-XI (GBWW Vol. 26, pp. 280-292)
- The Way Things Are (or On the Nature of Things) by Lucretius, Book VI (GBWW Vol. 11, pp. 77-91)
This will be the last week for Lucretius, and week two of three for Harvey. I’m picking up the pace on the Federalist in the hopes of finishing it by year’s end.
Here are some observations on last week’s readings:
- The Emperor Jones by Eugene O’Neill: Sigmund Freud, call your office. Jones has clearly cracked by Scene III. I would have liked to have seen more of a rise-and-fall trajectory in the plot, even though that probably wouldn’t have fit with what O’Neill was trying to do psychologically. This is probably the strangest play I have ever read. I’m not sure I could sit through a staging of this thing with those drums pounding throughout.
- “A Plea for Captain John Brown” by Henry David Thoreau: Did this turn anyone else’s stomach? Not only do we have the equating of an axe murderer with the Son of God, but we also have a number of misanthropic sentiments. Only half a dozen men have truly lived enough to be said to have died throughout history? No wonder he’s so sanguine about murder.
- “Letter to Herodotus” by Epicurus: I should have inferred it from Lucretius, but I had never realized that Epicurus blamed most of human anxiety on religion. His philosophy turns out to be just one more failed attempt to get from under the divine. That’s not to say I don’t find anything worthwhile in Epicurus’s thought. I appreciate his emphasis on moderation.
- Federalist #66: The impeachment power . . . surely one of the most unduly neglected provisions of the Constitution. Madison probably wouldn’t have bothered defending the provision had he known it would hardly ever be used.
- An Anatomical Disquisition on the Motion of the Heart and Blood in Animals by William Harvey, Introduction – Chapter V: After I got accustomed to a few unfamiliar terms, this reading went pretty smoothly. I appreciated the way Harvey showed respect for Galen and other earlier anatomists even as he disagreed with some of their theories. The description of Harvey’s careful observations was detailed but still accessible to the layman.
- The Way Things Are (or On the Nature of Things) by Lucretius, Book V: I guess moderns will forgive Lucretius for his Young Earth views as long as he insists that the gods didn’t make the world, but what about his insistence that the sun and moon are only as large as they appear to be to the naked eye? Or that all the species of animals sprang from the ground fully formed? The speculations about early man, on the other hand, sound like those of any run-of-the-mill Darwinist.
Temperatures dipped below 40 degrees here yesterday morning, and I’m loving it. This is prime sit-outside-the-coffee-shop-with-a-hot-drink-and-read weather. I’m going to do my best to stay on schedule; my wife’s due date is next week, and I could have an interruption at any time.