More Tributes to Mises

The introductory unit of George Reisman’s study program includes about 60 pages of reading from the appendices to the 4th edition of Ludwig von Mises’s Planning for Freedom. I covered the first part of the section, Murray Rothbard’s essay “The Essential Von Mises,” in a post last week. I’ll summarize the remainder in this post.

Four short pieces round out this section:

  1. Salute to Von Mises” by Henry Hazlitt: This essay was published in Barron’s on the 21ghkkohwhl-_bo1204203200_occasion of Mises’s 92nd birthday in 1973. Hazlitt lauds Mises’s contribution to monetary theory and critique of socialism. He also scolds the Nobel committee for not granting Mises its annual prize in economics, which was still relatively new at this point. He speculates that the committee is composed of cowards to don’t wish to appear to be choosing a side in contemporary political debates and would rather award the prize to mathematical economists who write obscurely.
  2. Mises’ Private Seminar” by Gottfried Haberler: This essay was originally published by the Mont Pelerin Society in 1961 on the occasion of Mises’s 80th birthday. Haberler recounts attending the weekly seminar Mises hosted in his offices at the Vienna Chamber of Commerce during the 1920s and early 1930s. These meetings attracted top names in the social sciences then working in Austria. They took place on Friday evening, beginning with a paper on some problem in economics or sociology by one of the attendees, followed by discussion. At 10:00 everyone walked to a nearby Italian restaurant and kept up the discussion, and then the more hardy ones (always including Mises himself) went from there to a coffeehouse at 11:30 to continue the discussion until 1:00 a.m. or so. Sounds like a fun way to spend a Friday night!
  3. How Mises Changed My Mind” by Albert Hunold: Also published by the Mont Pelerin Society in 1961, this essay is a “conversion narrative” from someone who read Mises’s Liberalism in the late 1920s and then met Mises at an economics conference dominated by socialists a year or two later. Hunold was inspired to read Socialism and completely rejected the socialist worldview,
    to the consternation of his economics colleagues.
  4. AEA Citation (American Economic Review, Sept. 1969): The American Economics Association named Mises a Distinguished Fellow near the end of his life. The citation is brief, surveying his major scholarly accomplishments. It ends with this intriguing statement: “The recent movements toward decentralized planning in several Soviet-type economies add the endorsement of history to the insights at which Mises arrived almost fifty years ago.” This was in 1969, decades before the Soviet collapse provided the ultimate vindication of Mises’s arguments concerning socialist economic calculation.

Most of this material didn’t provide me with any new information about Mises, but I enjoyed the personal recollections from Haberler and Hunold. Additionally, the AEA citation was good to see because I have encountered Mises-haters who seem to think his difficulty in securing an academic post in the U.S. after 1940 is some proof of his lack of competency as an economist. But if he was a hack, why did the most prestigious organization in the profession make him a Distinguished Fellow?

Anyway, on to the next reading!

 

Advertisements

About Dr. J

I am Professor of Humanities at Faulkner University, where I chair the Department of Humanities and direct online M.A. and Ph.D. programs based on the Great Books of Western Civilization. I am also Associate Editor of the Journal of Faith and the Academy and a member of the faculty at Liberty Classroom.
This entry was posted in Economics and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to More Tributes to Mises

  1. Craig says:

    Hi Doc

    I came to Mises and Murray Rothbard via Rushdoony and, primarily, Gary North, whose writings are still the best I’ve ever read.

    I beat up pretty severely on one hapless Sociology professor via his website by arguing against his forced wealth redistribution argument so badly he edited my posts, and has since taken down that discussion list altogether, which stil makes me laugh. Mises has been a great help.to countless people, and it is sad that he is not more widely recognized. The modern religion of Statism holds sway over most of the world today, and people raised on a diet of statism are unlikely to choose freedom when it’s offered them, hence the good Sociology Dr still has his job and his “Yes” men, who hang off every word he says. He is a disgrace, but that’s another story.

    Thanks again for your work – it’s a real blessing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s