“Honey, You’re Prettier Than All Those Other Women Who’ve Had My Children”

With more than 4,000 pages of the Great Books completed as of this morning, I suppose we have some justification for preening. No doubt all your friends and relations are showering you with praise if you’ve read everything posted here for the last nine months. Right? Of course, we still have more than 30,000 pages to read before we’re done with this project, so congratulate yourself too much just yet.

Here are some observations on last week’s readings:

  1. The Iliad of Homer, Books XIII-XV: It seems that this section is as much about the gods and their relationships as it is about the war. The scene where Hera schemes against Zeus and seduces him to distract him from the battle speaks volumes about how the Greeks viewed their gods. Every time I get to the point where I really admire the warriors, one of them starts gloating over a corpse, and the feeling fades somewhat.
  2. “Camillus” by Petrarch: This is my first time to read this particular biography, and I’m struck by how impressive Petrarch makes Camillus out to be. I’m sure he had some failings, or he wouldn’t have been provoking revolts constantly, but some of his decisions were the model of sagacity and virtue. I love the moment when he refuses to accept the defection of the schoolmaster who had brought along the besieged city’s children as hostages (depicted in the Poussin painting to the right).
  3. Second Treatise on Civil Government by John Locke, Chapters I-IV: There’s a lot of great stuff in this treatise, but I do think Locke makes some erroneous assumptions in these early chapters. For example, the existence of laws of nature (which I accept) does not imply the existence of a “state of nature,” and all the emphasis on this mythical state tempts me to go running to Robert Filmer, Locke’s chief antagonist.
  4. Federalist #57: Hamilton and Madison make good arguments that the elected representatives will be close to their constituents and have their interests at heart, but I wonder whether the mathematics of representation in 2011 (cited last week) invalidate at least a portion of their position here.
  5. “Beginnings and Endings” by Sir James Jeans: I was struck by the cycles in which scientific notions run while reading this piece. Writing in the late 1920s, Jeans says that the theory of what today people call “alien astronauts,” while once widely held, is now outdated and must be discarded. Tell that Richard Dawkins, who today is willing to concede that possibility as part of his violent opposition to special creation. Jeans’s optimism for the future of humanity was probably a rarity in the disillusion-filled interwar period.
  6. “The Philosophy of Common Sense” by Voltaire: Voltaire on religion is insufferable, but there are flashes of brilliance elsewhere. I like the emphasis on the necessity of virtue in friendship, for “the wicked have only accomplices.”

It’s time for me to get started on the readings I posted yesterday. I’m particularly looking forward to reading Lucretius for the first time, especially after reading the Santayana essay on him a few weeks back.

About Dr. J

I am Professor of Humanities at Faulkner University, where I chair the Department of Humanities and direct online M.A. and Ph.D. programs based on the Great Books of Western Civilization. I am also Associate Editor of the Journal of Faith and the Academy and a member of the faculty at Liberty Classroom.
This entry was posted in Books, Liberal Arts and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to “Honey, You’re Prettier Than All Those Other Women Who’ve Had My Children”

  1. “and all the emphasis on this mythical state tempts me to go running to Robert Filmer, Locke’s chief antagonist.”

    What?? No. Go running to Aristotle’s book 1 of the politics. The entire concept of the social compact is unnatural silliness.

  2. Jane says:

    Homer, The Iliad, XIII-XV: These books are notable for the machinations of the gods, the accumulation of corpses and the steely wherewithal of the two Ajaxes (son of Oileus and son of Telamon).

    Plutarch, Camillus: More stories of invasions & conquests that don’t particularly interest me, though I give Camillus credit for resisting public pressure to loot and destroy conquered territories. I was also intrigued by the story of the Alban lake whose waters inexplicably rose and spilled over the mountains, flooding the plains beneath; in hindsight, volcanic gases are suspected to have been the cause.

    Locke, 2nd Treatise on Civil Government, I-IV: A major inspiration for our Founding Fathers, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution – how in a state of Nature men are equal, should not be enslaved under any man or law other than that of Nature, have the right to defend themselves against those who would hurt them, and ought to punish offenders to discourage further transgressions.

    James Jeans, Beginnings and Endings: The implacable Second Law of Thermodynamics promises that “with universes as well as with mortals, the only possible life is progress to the grave.” While Jeans notes that man’s appearance comes early in the timeline and expresses excitement about our potential for growth and discovery, I wonder how much our potential for harm (pollution, warfare, DNA manipulation) would have worried him. As Steven Hawking noted, when it comes to the thus-far fruitless search for life – much less intelligent life – elsewhere in the universe, “it is not clear that intelligence has any long-term survival value.”

    Rousseau, The Philosophy of Common Sense: From Laws: “We resemble the monkeys more than any other animal, by virtue of our gift of mimicry, the frivolity of our ideas, and the inconstancy which has never permitted us to establish uniform and durable laws.” Man, General Reflection On: “It requires twenty years for man to rise from the vegetable state in which he is within his mother’s womb, and from the pure animal state which is the lot of his early childhood, to the state when the maturity of reason begins to appear. It has required thirty centuries to learn a little about his structure. It would need eternity to learn something about his soul. It takes an instant to kill him.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s