What Would a Balanced Federal Budget Look Like?

I’ve posted several times on this blog about the ridiculous levels of debt, both private and public, in our society. Many people are expressing optimism that the new Congress will “get serious” about addressing the problem at the level of the federal government. After all, the new leadership in the House of Representatives is talking tough about cutting $50 billion from the current fiscal year’s budget, right?

Unfortunately, $50 billion is a drop in the bucket compared to annual deficits of over $1 trillion and an overall debt of $13 trillion or more. To get an idea of what it will take to balance the federal budget, you have to wake up and smell the coffee.

If the budget is to be balanced, it’s going to have to come mostly from spending cuts, not increased taxes. Today the federal budget accounts for an historically outsized percentage of the economy, about 25% (the historic average over the last few decades is around 20%, and when we had balanced budgets on a technicality in the late 1990s, it was about 18%). Federal tax revenues are around 16% of GDP now. For anyone who thinks that taxing rich people can make up that difference, please realize that there simply aren’t enough of them to get anywhere close to those numbers. And if you start taxing them at punitive rates, they will leave for greener pastures around the world like Panama, Ecuador, Argentina, and Thailand.

Here is one proposal for balancing the federal budget by 2020. It includes cutting over $1 trillion annually from current levels of spending. Here are some line items:

  • $150 billion from defense
  • $94 billion from the Department of Education (the whole department)
  • $53 billion from HUD (the whole department)
  • $190 billion from Medicaid (by converting it to a block grant to the states and freezing spending)
  • $28 billion from farm subsidies

And the list goes on. Everyone’s ox will have to be gored at all income levels and from all partisan stripes. On the plus side, the government would stop sucking up all the available capital in the world to finance its deficit. (Did you know that the current deficit is about double the amount of all domestic annual savings?) We might see some sustainable investments developing and a restoration of real interest rates to help us determine which ones make sense and which ones don’t. And we’d be able to start freeing ourselves from debt bondage to Asians.

Scary stuff. Are you preparing for the inevitable austerity that is coming in one form or another? It’s going to have to be a return to recession as we adjust to spending cuts or (more likely) an inflationary environment if the feds try to print their way out of the debt obligations. What’s your savings rate? Do you have an emergency fund? Is a percentage of your wealth in hard assets? Are you carrying a lot of debt? Is your job vulnerable to another round of cost cutting? Address these concerns today, not when the storm hits.

Advertisements

About Dr. J

I am Professor of Humanities at Faulkner University, where I chair the Department of Humanities and direct online M.A. and Ph.D. programs based on the Great Books of Western Civilization. I am also Associate Editor of the Journal of Faith and the Academy and a member of the faculty at Liberty Classroom.
This entry was posted in Current Events and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to What Would a Balanced Federal Budget Look Like?

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention What Would a Balanced Federal Budget Look Like? | The Western Tradition -- Topsy.com

  2. 4myskin says:

    I only hope Education doesn’t keep getting the raw end of the deal. It seems to be the “go to” department when money needs to be cut, and too much of that will not help our future kids. But otherwise I agree with you. Lots of changes need to be made, and not by taxing!

    • Dr. J says:

      Thanks for your comment. The site I linked has the elimination of the Department of Education as part of its plan on the grounds that education is a state and local responsibility rather than a federal one. Other balance-budgeting plans will differ, I’m sure.

  3. I’d love to see China refuse to loan us any more money and force us to cut our spending. I’m with you on the elimination of the Dept. of Education and having it be a state and local responsibility too. I wouldn’t mind seeing the EPA go bye bye as well.

    For the record, I don’t know anyone my age that has my savings rate. I think it’s around 40%. We have a nice sized emergency fund and some of our wealth in hard assets (rental properties). Like all good girl scouts, I believe in being prepared.

  4. It gets even scarier when you consider 2d order effects–what will be the affect on the economy without the ag support and all the defense funds flowing? I absolutely agree there are bad times coming and politicians will never have the backbone to fix the problems until we face the avalanche the PIIGS are facing now. BTW I am debt free-including my home, retired, with minimal expenses. My major concern is how skyrocketing food inflation is taking more of my check-but the govt’s measure of inflation amazingly results in zero annual COLA’s.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s