It’s another Great Books Monday, and if you’re like me, you’re feeling a sense of accomplishment for finishing Plato’s Republic this past week. Hopefully you’ll get that feeling many more times as we make further progress in this project.
Here are the readings for the upcoming week:
- The Iliad of Homer, Books X-XII (GBWW Vol. 3, pp. 111-148)
- “A Modest Proposal” by Jonathan Swift (GGB Vol. 7, pp. 42-49)
- “Characters” by Jean de la Bruyère (GGB Vol. 6, pp. 102-105; Adler excerpts the following entries: I.24, V.43, VI.18, VI.83, X.11)
- Federalist #55-56 (GBWW Vol. 40, pp. 172-176; Antifederalist responses are here)
- “On Mathematical Method“by Alfred N. Whitehead (GGB Vol. 9, pp. 51-67; Chapters I-III of An Introduction to Mathematics)
- “The Sentiment of Rationality” by William James (GGB Vol. 10, pp. 58-87)
It seems amazing, but after reading William James this week, we’ll only have a couple more selections remaining in the GGB‘s volume of philosophical essays. Do you feel smarter?
Here are some observations on last week’s readings:
- The Iliad of Homer, Books VII-IX: The duel between Aias and Hector is pretty impressive. Strange how they try to kill each other, and then give each other presents. It’s also noteworthy how Achilles essentially admits his own petulance when he refuses to be reconciled to Agamemnon and return to the fighting near the end of Book IX.
- “Of Experience” by Michel de Montaigne: I’ll be honest; I could have done without reading about Montaigne’s kidney stones. In fact, a lot of this essay reminds one of an old-timer who is determined to talk about his various ailments to anyone who will listen. There are some flashes of brilliance, though. I especially liked the stuff about laws near the beginning of the essay.
- Plato’s Republic, Book X: I suppose it’s safe to say that Adler et al were not persuaded that poets should be banished; almost one-third of the Great Books collections consists of imaginative literature, or “imitation.” Still, Plato ends this work with a bang: a scene of judgment and reincarnation. In my view, the argument for the soul’s immortality rescues the argument for always acting justly regardless of material gain.
- Federalist #54: Much of this essay is a defense of the Three-Fifths Clause, and there is a certain logic to it given the assumptions of the day. Both North and South wanted to have it both ways when it came to counting or not counting slaves for purposes of representation and taxation. Southerners wanted to count them for representation but not for taxation; Northerners wanted the reverse. No doubt Madison and Hamilton would have been bewildered by the claims of Al Gore and others that the Three-Fifths Clause was making some sort of metaphysical judgment about the humanity of black people.
- “On a Piece of Chalk” by Thomas Huxley: This is one of two selections in the GGB set by “Darwin’s bulldog.” The discussion of the formation of chalk and the similarities of England’s deposits to the Atlantic floor is clear and compelling. The extrapolations near the end of the essay are less so, and Huxley shows his hand with very prejudicial comments on the last couple of pages. “Detached observer,” indeed.
- How We Think by John Dewey, Chapter XIX: Dewey makes what, again, seem to be straightforward and commonsensical recommendations for education. It’s unfortunate that the implementation of these ideas often seems to be next to impossible. With the “combination of play and work,” for example, what teachers often end up doing is trying to trick students into learning something in the context of a time-consuming game or “activity.” In other areas, such as the study of “dead languages,” there’s no way to get around rote learning of conjugations, declensions, and the like. Dewey shrinks from such activities in disgust.
We had gorgeous weather after the tropical storm blew through last week, and I actually put on a sweater a couple of times. It has warmed up a bit since then, but I have high hopes that there will be more reading outdoors in the near future.