A Fond Farewell to Herodotus

This week we will break the 3,000-page mark in our Great Books reading project. If you are new to this site, don’t let that number discourage you for a minute! Everyone starts from zero, and it’s not necessary to read everything we’ve been through on this site to get a great deal from the program. Pick something small to start and jump into the Great Conversation!

Here are the readings for the upcoming week:

  1. The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson  (GGB Vol. 2, pp. 288-341)
  2. Resolutions when I Come to Be Old” by Jonathan Swift (GGB Vol. 7, p. 42)
  3. Plato’s Republic, Book III (GBWW Vol. 6, pp. 325-342)
  4. Federalist #45 (GBWW Vol. 40, pp. 147-150; Antifederalist responses are here)
  5. The Sunless Sea” by Rachel Carson (GGB Vol. 8, pp. 132-146; Chapter 4 of The Sea Around Us)
  6. How We Think by John Dewey, Chapter II (GGB Vol. 10, pp. 101-114)

The Carson book is still under copyright, and the Google Books text of Chapter 4 I’ve linked to is incomplete. If anyone can find a link to the full text, please let me know.

Here are some observations on last week’s readings:

  1. The Tempest by William Shakespeare: It never ceases to amaze me that some people continue to defend Caliban as a victim of “colonialism” when the text makes clear that he wasn’t treated harshly until his attempted rape of Miranda. Moreover, he shows no remorse whatsoever. Anthony Esolen gave a fantastic lecture on this play on our campus a few years ago, showing how Shakespeare is drawing heavily from Isaiah and other Biblical texts in this work, which essentially constituted his public farewell to the stage.
  2. The Histories of Herodotus, Book IX: I confess I found the constant Spartan maneuvering from one end of the Greek line to the other to avoid facing the Persians to be pretty comical. Mardonius falls victim to hubris here, and the subsequent disorder in the Persian ranks is noteworthy, particularly with the general who took his troops out of the battle before they had fought, marching them straight to the Hellespont. And what about the story of the guy who cut his own foot off to get out of the shackles?
  3. Plato’s Republic, Book II: The story of the Ring of Gyges is fun (remember Gyges from Herodotus’s first book?). I don’t want to show my hand too early here, but I’ve never been fully convinced of Socrates’s argument that justice is still desirable in the circumstances set up by Glaucon and Adeimantus absent a “heavenly reward.”
  4. Federalist #44: This essay defends the Constitution’s explicit restrictions on State powers, which make sense for the most part. The discussion of the “necessary and proper” clause seems reasonable on its face, but historical experience has invalidated its value, in my opinion. It has turned out to be a loophole through which an 18-wheeler can be driven to concentrate more and more power at the political center.
  5. “The Sphinx” by Francis Bacon: I found Bacon’s interpretation of the story of the Sphinx a bit fanciful. Sure, you can “read” the sphinx that way, but I seriously doubt that it originated as a parable for the sciences. Adler points out that Bacon’s confidence at the dawn of the Scientific Revolution that the problems of the natural world and of the human condition are of a piece was probably misplaced.
  6. How We Think by John Dewey, Chapter I: I’m almost certain that Dewey and I will have a falling out before the end, but this chapter was pretty good. Of course, I had a hard time sticking with him when so much of his illustrations rested on the false notion that Christopher Columbus lived in an era when everyone thought the world was flat.

I’m writing this post from Albuquerque, New Mexico, where I’m attending the annual meeting of the Mythopoeic Society. Yesterday I presented a paper as part of a panel including Corey Olsen and other members of the weekly seminar on the Silmarillion in which I’ve been participating since January. It has been a great experience, but I’ll be glad to get home and see my family today. I think I’ll read some Great Books on the plane!

About these ads

About Dr. J

I am an Associate Professor and head of the Department of Humanities at Faulkner University. I am also Associate Editor of the Journal of Faith and the Academy.
This entry was posted in Books, Liberal Arts and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to A Fond Farewell to Herodotus

  1. James says:

    What? The Spartans, the very epitome of manliness and fortitude, chickened out while fighting the Persians? And I thought they spent all their time fearlessly battling Persian rhinos and malformed Persian goliaths while wearing red capes and leather underwear, and yelling, “This is Sparta!” in Scottish accents.

  2. Dr. J says:

    According to Herodotus, the continual moving wasn’t due to cowardice. The Greek strategy was to position the Athenians opposite the Persians because they had fought them before at Marathon and had knowledge of their tactics; the Spartans were to face Persia’s Greek allies, with whose tactics they in turn were accustomed to. (All the Spartans who had faced Persia at Thermopylae, of course, were dead.) The Persians kept shifting their own lines so as to be opposite the Spartans. It was like musical chairs.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s